Constructivism Based Teaching Learning
For Download PDF File Click On Here
Abstract
Constructivism
Basic characteristics of Constructivist
Learning Environments
The following four basic characteristics of constructivist learning environments, which must be considered when implementing constructivist instructional strategies:
1) Knowledge will be shared between teachers and students.
2) Teachers and students will share authority.
3) The teacher's role is one of a facilitator or guide.
4) Learning groups
will consist of small numbers of heterogeneous students.
One of the primary goals of using constructivist teaching is that students learn how to learn by giving them the training to take initiative for their own learning experiences.
According to Audrey Gray, the characteristics of a constructivist classroom are as follows:
1. The learners are actively involved
2. The environment is democratic
3. The activities are interactive and student-centered
Constructivist Teaching Learning
In the constructivist classroom, students work primarily in groups and learning and knowledge are interactive and dynamic. There is a great focus and emphasis on social and communication skills, as well as collaboration and exchange of ideas. This is contrary to the traditional classroom in which students work primarily alone, learning is achieved through repetition, and the subjects are strictly adhered to and are guided by a textbook. Some activities encouraged in constructivist classrooms are:
1. Experimentation: students individually perform an experiment and then come together as a class to discuss the results.
2. Research projects: students research a topic and can present their findings to the class.
3. Field trips. This allows students to put the concepts and ideas discussed in class in a real-world context. Field trips would often be followed by class discussions.
4. Films. These provide visual context and thus bring another sense into the learning experience.
5. Class discussions. This technique is used in all of the methods described above. It is one of the most important distinctions of constructivist teaching methods.
Difference between Traditional Classroom
and Constructivist Classroom
In
the constructivist classroom, the focus tends to shift from the teacher to the
students. The classroom is no longer a place where the teacher pours knowledge
into passive students, who wait like empty vessels to be filled. In the
constructivist model, the students are urged to be actively involved in their
own process of learning. The teacher functions more as a facilitator who
coaches, mediates, prompts, and helps students develop and assess their
understanding, and thereby their learning. And, in the constructivist
classroom, both teacher and students think of knowledge not as inert factoids
to be memorized, but as a dynamic, ever-changing view of the world we live in and the ability to
successfully stretch and explore that view.
Traditional Classroom
|
Constructivist Classroom
|
1. Curriculum begins with the parts of the whole. Emphasizes basic skills. |
1. Curriculum emphasizes big concepts, beginning with the whole and expanding to include the parts. |
2. Strict adherence to fixed curriculum is highly valued. |
2. Pursuit of student questions and interests is valued. |
3. Materials are primarily textbooks and workbooks. |
3. Materials include primary sources of material and manipulative materials. |
4. Learning is based on repetition. |
4. Learning is interactive, building on what the student already knows. |
5. Teachers disseminate information to students; students are recipients of knowledge. |
5. Teachers have a dialogue with students, helping students construct their own knowledge. |
6. Teacher's role is directive, rooted in authority. |
6. Teacher's role is interactive, rooted in negotiation. |
7. Assessment is through testing, correct answers. |
7. Assessment includes student works, observations, and points of view, as well as tests. Process is as important as product. |
8. Knowledge is seen as inert. |
8. Knowledge is seen as dynamic, ever changing with our experiences. |
9. Students work primarily alone. |
9. Students work primarily in groups. |
10. Teacher role is Important but according to child role of teacher is change. |
10. In the constructivist classroom, the teacher’s role is to prompt and facilitate discussion. |
Role of Teachers
The constructivism does not reduce the importance of the teacher, on the other hand their role becomes more complex, difficult and crucial. In the constructivist classroom, the teacher’s role is to prompt and facilitate discussion. Thus, the teacher’s main focus should be on guiding students by asking questions that will lead them to develop their own conclusions on the subject. David Janssen identified three major roles for facilitators to support students in constructivist learning environments.
1. Modeling 2. Coaching 3. Scaffolding 4. Motivation for Learning
5. Observer 6. Helper 7.
Application of constructivism for
teaching and learning in Classroom
The
field of education has undergone a significant shift in thinking about the
nature of human learning and the conditions that best promote the varied
dimensions of human learning. As in psychology, there has been a paradigm shift
in designed instruction; from behaviorism to cognitivist and now to
constructivism. The following steps is important when implementing
constructivist teaching and learning in Classroom...
1) To provide experience with the knowledge construction process (students determine how they will learn). 2) To provide experience in and appreciation for multiple perspectives (evaluation of alternative solutions). 3) To embed learning in realistic contexts (authentic tasks). 4) To encourage ownership and a voice in the learning process (student centered learning). 5) To embed learning in social experience (collaboration). 6) To encourage the use of multiple modes of representation, (video, audio text, etc.) 7) To encourage awareness of the knowledge construction process (reflection, metacognition).
Benefits of Constructivism
1. Children learn more, and enjoy learning more when they are actively involved, rather than passive listeners. 2.Education works best when it concentrates on thinking and understanding, rather than on rote memorization. Constructivism concentrates on learning how to think and understand. 3. Constructivist learning is transferable. In constructivist classrooms, students create organizing principles that they can take with them to other learning settings. 4. Constructivism gives students ownership of what they learn, since learning is based on students' questions and explorations, and often the students have a hand in designing the assessments as well. Constructivist assessment engages the students' initiatives and personal investments in their journals, research reports, physical models, and artistic representations. Engaging the creative instincts develops students' abilities to express knowledge through a variety of ways. The students are also more likely to retain and transfer the new knowledge to real life. 5. By grounding learning activities in an authentic, real-world context, constructivism stimulates and engages students. Students in constructivist classrooms learn to question things and to apply their natural curiosity to the world. 6. Constructivism promotes social and communication skills by creating a classroom environment that emphasizes collaboration and exchange of ideas. Students must learn how to articulate their ideas clearly as well as to collaborate on tasks effectively by sharing in group projects. Students must therefore exchange ideas and so must learn to "negotiate" with others and to evaluate their contributions in a socially acceptable manner. This is essential to success in the real world, since they will always be exposed to a variety of experiences in which they will have to cooperate and navigate among the ideas of others.
Criticism of Constructivism
1. Mayer (2004) Argues that not all teaching techniques based on constructivism are efficient or effective for all learners, suggesting many educators misapply constructivism to use teaching techniques that require learners to be behaviorally active. He describes this inappropriate use of constructivism as the "constructivist teaching fallacy". 2. In contrast, Kirschner,(2006) describe constructivist teaching methods as "unguided methods of instruction." They suggest more structured learning activities for learners with little to no prior knowledge. 3. Another concern held by critics of constructivism is that learners need to connect their knowledge to tangible objects in order to ensure that they have acquired the knowledge, and constructivist approaches do not support this learning-related need. According to these critics, cognitive learning is not enough for individuals; one must demonstrate knowledge by making artifacts (Papert & Harel, 1991). 4. Other concerns include that the Piagetian concept of constructivism overlooks important contextual factors in learning environments such as available educational resources, the need to integrate media into learning environments, learners’ preferences, and the affordance of individual student thinking (Ackermann, 2001). From a constructionist perspective, students are like blank slates for whom teachers need to design common instruction to guide them in how to learn and perform. In constructivist approaches, instructors are facilitators and not explicitly teachers. In a clearly-defined way of teaching, knowledge is not taught explicitly; rather, it is delivered as an accompaniment to learners’ experiences (Piaget & Inhelder, 2008) Constructivism focuses on learners’ cognitive process, whereas constructionism focuses more on tangible production: “Knowledge can best be learned or only learned through experience that is based primarily on the procedures of the discipline” (Kir schner. 2006)
Conclusion
Dr. Shaikh Mujeeb Shaikh Zameer
In-charge Principal A.M. College of Education (B.Ed.) Malegoan
Research Scholar, Dept. of Education Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Hyderabad
No comments:
Post a Comment